Play chess online, chess games, chess puzzles, chess games database, online games, chess league, board games, chess clubs, free online chess games, free chess online, chess teams and more...


Chess Forum
play-chess-online.com   << - < - > - >>
FromMessage
ccmcacollister
play-chess-online.com chess

2/09/2006
16:02:19

play online chess
Subject: Great Chess Books

Message:
Once again, as the winter doldrums come round ... it is time to ask; Whats the greatest Chess books out there, now or ever?
For me:
1.Modern Chess Brilliancies - Evans
2.200 Games of M. Tal
2* Its not a book, but its GREAT; Game of The Month articles of Gligoric
3.The Games of RJF
4.MCO-10 & 12
5.Amatuer's Mind - Silman
6.Oxford Chess Companion
7.200 Open Games (of/by GM D.Bronstein)
8.Chess Catechism - Evans
9.My 60 Memorable Games - RJF
10. to be decided ...
***
not necessarily in the order given
What do you think?
}8-)


basbos
play-chess-online.com chess

2/09/2006
22:45:32

play online chess
for me....

Message:

1-play like a grandmaster by Kotov
2-My system by Nimzovitsch
3-Modern chess strategy by Ludek Pachman( A unique book for middle game)

I have not finished reading them yet , but they are wonderful and I learn a lot from them.


drtimer
play-chess-online.com chess

2/10/2006
02:06:00

play online chess
best one so far

Message:
Openings for the Club Player - Tim Harding, Batsford

I've only been playing proper chess for last 18 months, this book made me a better player


ionadowman
play-chess-online.com chess

2/10/2006
02:40:21

play online chess
There are...

Message:
...several kinds of chess book, of course: openings, middle game, end games, game anthologies (general, biographical and autobiographical, and also the good old 'bedside companion'. So, let's see what I have in my (very dated) chess library:
Openings: Several old Batsford opening treatises, Keene and Levy's 'Opening repertoire for the Attacking Player', and Yakov Estrin's monograph on the Two Knights' Defence (great book, but it did cause my first defeat on GK)...
Middle Game: My System, and Keres and Kotov's 'Art of the Middle Game in Chess', Capablanca's 'Last Lectures'...
End Games: Averbakh's 'Queen and Pawn Endings' and Levenfish and Smyslov's 'Rook Endings' (Batsford)...
Anthologies: Clarke's "Tal's Best Games..." (up to 1960). Haven't got RJF's 'My 60 memorable Games' but though not a Fischer fan myself, I found the book very impressive at many levels, as well as an enjoyable read.
'Bedside Companion': I wish I still had Irving Chernev's "Bright Side of Chess"... Some snurge made off with it several zillion years ago, and I still mourn its loss :-(let's get lachrymose)-: Its most attractive feature were its several endgame studies, a fascinating aspect of chess... Of all my volumes, that would probably have best stood the test of time, too.


ccmcacollister
play-chess-online.com chess

2/10/2006
13:49:05

play online chess
How could I forget ...

Message:
When speaking of what has gained me rating points .... Think Like a GM by Kotov certainly , since I use the techniques in there EVERY time I play. (Sometimes better than others :)
And of course "Play The French" by Watson did more for my postal rating than any other single source of opening recommendations.
The Tal book was also a big rating gainer I think, as it develops a new way of thinking if one has been restricted to Nimzovich-like play in the past. It shows you how to open lines, and utilize activity, in a Big Way. }8-))


ccmcacollister
play-chess-online.com chess

2/11/2006
15:15:13

play online chess
I got a new Chess book today!

Message:
That strange mood of desiring to study Chess fell upon me, and I purchased a new Smith-Morra Gambit text to see if anything new has risen. Used to have the one by Ken Smith but where oh where can it be? Lost in moving i think.
***
But really wanted to mention one I saw today at the used bookstore that looked quite interesting to me, tho I did not want it $20-worth. Still i think it could be a Very useful and instructive book to intermediate players especially. It is called " ChessMasterVsChessAmateur " by WC/GM Max Euwe & Walter Mieden. YES, it annotates games of Masters vs Amateurs, as you suspected. Which I think is a great subject of study for those who wish to learn How to Do Things, and What to Do; besides just showing how to capitalize upon errors. I haven't read it, but did enjoy my previous Mieden book quite a lot, titled " TheRoadToChessMastery " and is similarly annotated and very understandable.
If you have read either of those, I'd like to know what you thought of it/them ?
Regards }8-)




doctor_knight
play-chess-online.com chess

2/13/2006
20:47:59

play online chess


Message:
Recently I have very much enjoyed collections of Purdy's writings, most namely "Purdy on the Endgame." The discussion on sister squares was particularly interesting. As an inexperienced player I have enjoyed Andrew Soltis's Grandmaster Secrets series. It is very engaging and practicle. The one on openings significantly improved my opening play and the I'm now reading the endgame one and I'm enjoying it. I'm really starting to appreciate the endgame.

Does anyone have a favorite book on combinations to solve?


ccmcacollister
play-chess-online.com chess

2/13/2006
21:30:33

play online chess
Smpyjrt pmr od ///

Message:
OOPs, to decipher the above without your secret decoder ring, move both hands to the right one letter on keyboard, and go...
***
This one keeps coming up. Mlazar was telling me this is his fav. Also wschmidt mentions it in the Coaching Club Forums; and the writer "Purdy" has been acclaimed
by Fischer in the past as well! So based on all that, plus my curiosity and the good advice I've already glimpsed in small tidbits, from this book, I have placed my order at the Amazon dotcom for : C.J.S. Purdy's Fine Art of Chess Annotation and other thoughts....compiled and edited by Ralph J. Tykodi ... which is a veritable major bargain, starting at $4.95 for NEW editions; or $5 to 6 dollars for USED copies.
I don't know why USED is more. Perhaps they are loaded with previous owners Chess secrets scrawled in the margins?! So who knows, if you go used you just Might get a copy RJF used to own?!! (As he has said that many items he had in storage in the USA were seized from him ... and I assume sold or auctioned. I think I am joking ... but then, who really knows what treasure may lurk in a good used book?! )
I can't wait to get this. See this link for some sample advice of Purdy, from the great GK Coaching Club forums :


ccmcacollister
play-chess-online.com chess

2/13/2006
21:33:09

play online chess
hyperlink promised ...

Message:
.
-> Chess.com


schnarre
play-chess-online.com chess

2/14/2006
14:37:33

play online chess
Hmmnnn...

Message:
For me, let's see:

Morphy's Games of Chess
Opening Systems for Competetive Chess Players
Oxford Chess Companion
Karl Marx Plays Chess
My System
Dynamic White Openings
Dynamic Black Defenses

....to name just a few.


ionadowman
play-chess-online.com chess

2/15/2006
00:57:15

play online chess
Purdyisms...

Message:
I had a look at the link, and Purdy's remark about getting your pieces well and actively placed before even Thinking about creating a passed pawn might have been useful (had I but known it!) in at least one of my current games...
Cheers,
Ion


nottop
play-chess-online.com chess

2/15/2006
15:57:29

play online chess
missing

Message:
I've found errors in Purdy analysis of the Grunfeld - although the book is good.
However I think, if you really want great chess books that will improve your game, I suggest you look at any books by Dvoretsky.
In my opinion they are the finest chess books ever written.

As for Silman - I think he's a mediocre hack with little to say. Skip the Silman - do the Dvoretsky.



nottop
play-chess-online.com chess

2/15/2006
17:15:04

play online chess
More on Silman

Message:
I just can't believe how popular this hack is. In his book he talks about "imbalances" - notice the imbalances.
Well - like -
duh ...

How do these imbalances occur in the first place?
You just notice them??

Imbalances start with the first move - and it is not a circumstantial event. Imbalances are planned with like
duh ....

a plan.

His one correspondence game was a joke - he lucked into a draw and accused his opponent of cheating - even after receiving analysis from his opponent that he admitted was convincing.
And the "computer generated move" he accused his opponent of making - was actually in the databases (as his editor reluctantly pointed out).

What a total loser.

And yet - when I see books recommended I always see Silman - people that write about chess that might actually improve you (like Dvoretsky) are ignored.

So stop with the Silman nonsense - the man is a total loser with nothing to say.
He will actually decrease the quality of your play.

Aside from Dvoretsky I suggest you look at books by Watson - his reinterpretation of Nimzovich is wonderful.

What the grandmasters say - and what the grandmasters do - is completely different. They tell you to study the ideas of chess - but what they do - they study their openings and keep up to date on the latest twists.

It's a lot more pleasant to fight for the win than fight for the draw.




wschmidt
play-chess-online.com chess

2/16/2006
12:22:19

play online chess
Wow, nottop,

Message:
How do you really feel about Silman?

I'll start with a few of caveats. First, I've got to say I'm hesitant to question the judgment of someone up in the 2000+ range, although that's more with regard to actual chess play than in judgement about chess books. And second, I only know Dvoretsky's books by reputation (which is, generally, excellent but for advanced players). Finally, I don't know anything about the correspondence incident you referred to, so I have to plead ignorance about that.

That said, I'm frankly amazed at the vehemence of your post. First, in all the messages posted prior to yours, Silman was mentioned once. And that was for a beginning/intermediate book, The Amatuer's Mind, that doesn't really spend a lot of time on the imbalance concept. I can't imagine any player in the intended audience for that book who wouldn't benefit from studying it.

And with regard to the issue of imbalances, Silman doesn't simply say "notice imbalances" Both "Reassess Your Chess" and The Reassess Your Chess Workbook" spend a lot of time talking about playing to create imbalances. He encourages intermediate players (neither is a beginner's book) to look hard at the board
and formulate plans based either on imbalances that exist or imbalances that can be created. There are surely other ways of thinking about chess, but, as a roadmap, it ain't bad.

Most of us are never going to get to the point where we are completely free from applying general principles ("Castle early", "a knight on the rim is dim") or using planning principles suggested by stronger players ("look for candidate moves and calculate the outcome of each only once", "make plans based on imbalances or potential imbalances"). And I remember reading some grandmaster's observation when asked about the Silman principles to the effect that "if you're spending your time at the board thinking about imbalances, you're not a grandmaster". Well, duh. But for a lot of intermediate players, Silman provides a pretty good set of principles.

And maybe Dvoretsky is a better mapmaker or provider of principles that we all should look into. But to suggest that Silman is a "mediocre hack"' a "total loser with nothing to say" who will "actually decrease the quality of your play" seems a little extreme. ws


ccmcacollister
play-chess-online.com chess

2/16/2006
19:22:21

play online chess
wschmidt ...

Message:
I have to agree with you . . .
For that matter, if you Plan you are not a GM! Unless in a very strange new position
:) GM's dont really plan, they only tell us to. Theyve seen it all before. They know what to do in anysimilar position. Just need to prove things out with analysis, and look for exceptions. They dont even play "positions" as such for 1/2 the game. They play transpositions. Imo. Someone tell me if I'm wrong.
...
I think SIlman does have some deficiencies in print. Besides being less than kind to his students in A/M, he only addresses dynamics, not statics. Which is only 1/2 the picture. Maybe he covers it elswhere, I dont know. Have only read the one. Nontheless I consider it good for players of many levels. Mainly thru intermediate, but I picked up a couple things I didnt know in the first 50 pages. And why not, he is an IM. And he does get things across. And like Kotov Think Like A GM, it seems a good explicative read to me for most anyone. But they tell me its easier than that great text. So I defend the book on that basis. The author, I have never met.
BTW, he DOES stress planning in A/M. From the first 1/2 dozen moves yet. Now to me that does seem excessive and a bit silly. But I've seen FM/NM's go down in a dozen or so moves, from inattention & following something less than good (I wont say unsound:) they saw before...so if it promotes thinking about the game... well I guess one could ponder move 5 of the Ruy?! If it helps!?
I think Evans is the best Chess author ever, Imo. But give high marks to Dunne & Watson & Kotov. Gligorich is a great Chess writer & superhuman opening innovator. I'd probably add Benko for his endgame series, but havent read his last book.
I guess some I enjoy are a bit dated. Perhaps you have that glazed look in your eyes like I get when people start into Capa's games or Laskers writing. I just havent gone there. But doenst mean I dont think I could learn from it! :)


ionadowman
play-chess-online.com chess

2/17/2006
00:47:51

play online chess
From the little I've seen...

Message:
...the quality of chess writing (qua 'writing') seems much higher these days than formerly. Ray Keene, in his book for beginners to club level (?) makes every game sound exciting and dynamic. Russian (Soviet) writers used to follow a kind of formula that worked for me: Beginning the annotation of a game by outlining, in prose, the course of the game - as it were a story - before getting into the detail. As for the quality of the advice - well, I've noticed some disagreement among writers. E.g. Tarrasch's advice: When you find a good move, look for a better (Repeated by Heisman, in his 'Novice Nook' column). Bill Hartston takes the opposite line: If you find a good move, play it! Capablanca, I believe, said much the same thing.
Cheers,
Ion


ccmcacollister
play-chess-online.com chess

2/18/2006
23:15:15

play online chess
GREAT POINT ...

Message:
there ionadowman !
["Russian (Soviet) writers used to follow a kind of formula that worked for me: Beginning the annotation of a game by outlining, in prose, the course of the game - as it were a story - before getting into the detail."]
* * *
I did not know that it was a technique common to Russian Chess writers, but I like it too! And found that my book by GM DAvid Bronstein IS just like you suggest, with
a little summary aor story pertaining to the game, just in preface of it.
That is especially enjoyable to me, since i enjoy Chess tales and annecdotes very much, but you just don't seem to be able to find such personal aspects of Chess players at play, out there in the Publication World.
***
}8-)


wschmidt
play-chess-online.com chess

2/21/2006
14:17:15

play online chess
I like short chess books....

Message:
close to 100 pages, because I get a feeling of accomplishment when I finish them. And that's something that I often don't get with longer books - because I often don't finish them (easily distractable I guess). Here are a few of my favorite short books:

Micheal Stean - "Simple Chess". In my opinion, this should be every beginner/intermediate player's first book on positional play.

Two by Botvinnik - "Botvinnik on the Endgame" and "Fifteen Games and Their Stories". The latter conforms to the "little story before the game score method" described above and is well done.

Edmar Mednis - "Practical Rook Endgames". Mednis has a whole series of short "Practical" endgame books. I've read that 50% of all endgames are rook endgames so this is a good one to have. One of the most exciting games I ever played was a draw I salvaged based on what I learned from this book.

Ray Keene - "The Twelve Best Games of Chess". OK, this is not "My 60 Memorable Games" or "The Art of Attack in Chess" or "My Great Predecessor, Vol. 1." But it is a short collection of well-annotated historic games with an introduction to each player and the circumstances surrounding the games. Keene has another collection of twelve games for the same publisher called "Gary Kasparov's Best Games" which I haven't seen, but my guess is, it's good.

Two other short game collections and I'm outa here: Seirawan's "Winning Chess Brilliancies" has 12 annotated games with a bit more pedagogy than Keene's collection. And finally, there's Pandolfini's "Russian Chess". This is a whole book built around move-by-move annotations of 6 games. Some folks think Pandofini is too simple. I'm a simple guy and he works for me.

And yes, as mentioned earlier in the thread, I'm a big Purdy fan (his books are often for sale on EBay by Carsten Hanson at at great price), but they're all closer to 150 pages, so they didn't make the cut for this post. ws



online chess -- play chess
chess game -- chess club
chess online -- chess online
chess game -- chess club
play-chess-online.com play-chess-online.com play-chess-online.com